Director: Lucio Fulci
Writer(s): Fulci, Dardano Sacchetti, Gianfranco Clerici, and Vincenzo Mannino
Depending on who you ask, Lucio Fulci’s The New York Ripper
has either achieved cult status as one of the director’s best, and most brutal
films, or is panned as being a cruel, misogynistic film with little-to-no
redeeming qualities. The former
viewpoint is generally shared with fans of Italian horror cinema, or more
specifically, the Italian “giallo” film, which is basically the Italian
equivalent of the American slasher film; the latter, is shared by virtually
every film critic who has seen it.
It is true that just about all of its violence is directed
at female characters, and is shown in sometimes cringe-inducing detail; it is
actually these qualities that I find most intriguing. But rather than load the film up with graphic
deaths, Fulci lets his foot off the gas about midway through, leading to a long
gap between any murders. And like many
Fulci flicks, when there is no blood, it’s painfully boring. So much so that my wife and I got up to do
other things while just allowing this to run as background noise; when that
still didn’t lead to anything, I eventually fast-forwarded it to the next
violent scene, which mercifully happened to take us to the ending.
Typical of many Italian horror flicks released in the States, The New York Ripper features actors of all nationalities speaking in their native
tongues, with all of it overdubbed into English. While I find it to be an annoying trait (I
would rather just have English subtitles), it’s made even moreso by the
absolutely terrible dialogue, which is often unintentionally hilarious,
although the terrible voice acting certainly didn’t help. About the only good decision in the sound
design is the batshit crazy idea to have the killer talk like a certain popular
cartoon duck (?). While it may sound terrible (and for some folks, the
execution will be as dumb as it sounds), I thought it was incredibly effective,
and was one of the few genuinely brilliant ideas in a movie that is clearly
content with achieving mediocrity.
Still, there are enough moments of graphic bloodshed to keep
fans of violent cinema entertained for at least a few minutes, with the
climactic scene (involving a razor blade and several parts of a woman’s body)
being so effective that they are virtually “must see” moments of cinema
brutality. I certainly can’t recommend
it as any sort of a classic, even within Fulci’s limited resume, but there
might be enough here for gorehounds looking for a quick fix…just don’t expect
much more than that.
RECAP: In the film’s
first-half, the misogyny and graphic violence actually combine to create an
appropriately menacing atmosphere; one that is helped along by the peculiar
decision to have the killer talk like a duck (?). But by allowing the deaths to stop, and the
focus on ‘whodunit’ to take over, all the momentum of the first half is gone,
and there’s very little to recommend, beyond the sparse, yet impressive, bursts
of violence.
SCORE: 4/10
UNCUT TRAILER:
No comments:
Post a Comment