Ad Code

Showing posts with label 1977. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1977. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2016

Hausu (1977)

Director: Nobuhiko Ôbayashi
Writer(s): Chiho Katsura, from an idea by Chigumi Ã”bayashi
Starring: Kimiko Ikegami, Miki Jinbo, Kimiko Ohba, and Ai Matsubara




If Criterion, the company that released this long-hidden Japanese “haunted house” flick to the masses, can’t find a fitting way to describe it on the back of its own DVD case, then how am I supposed to describe it to you, my loyal readers?  The internet is chock-full of attempts to accurately convey what you’re in for when you sit down to a screening of Nobohiko Obayashi’s Hausu (House), and while they all succeed to some extent, the only way to really get an understanding of what it’s all about is simply to watch it.  It’s every bit as bizarre and indefinable as you've been lead to believe. 

But to simply dismiss it as a part horror, part comedy oddity is to ignore the freewheeling genius of Obayashi’s vision:  It’s a non-stop parade of originality, unveiled at a truly feverish, awe-inspiring pace.  Yet it’s all somehow imbued with an undercurrent of sincere emotion; the final sequence makes a statement that would be eye-rolling and preachy in any other work of melodramatic fiction, and yet here—amidst a sea of non-sequiturs and outlandish behavior—it somehow hits home, if for no other reason than it seems to be the only genuine scene in this whole state of affairs.

Describing the plot of Hausu is a truly futile, frustrating process, so I will just stick to the bare minimum:  Gorgeous (that is her name) plans to take a vacation with her father, who reveals at the last minute that another woman will be accompanying them: she is Ryouko, a woman that her father has been dating, without Gorgeous' knowledge, for some time now.  Disgusted at the thought of her dad getting over the loss of her mother so quickly (she died a whopping eight years ago), she refuses to accompany him, and instead writes a letter to an aunt that she has not seen in a decade, asking if she can come and visit her in her creepy secluded mansion.

She gets a letter back, accepting her request, and rounds up some friends from school to go with her.  Amusingly, similar to Gorgeous (so known because of her good looks) all of her friends are also named based on their personalities: There’s Prof (short for professor; she’s smart), Mac (is larger than the rest and always craves food), Fantasy (who is always daydreaming), Sweet (who is a clean freak), Kung Fu (who likes to fight), and Melody (who can play the piano).  All of them will rely on their unique traits to get them out of (or to put them in) perilous situations as it becomes apparent the house as a mind of its own.

But I’m getting a little ahead of myself here.  The aunt seems to be very excited to have visitors, as it is reiterated again and again that visitors rarely, if ever, come around.  Then, all of a sudden Mac disappears.  The remaining girls alternate between occasional concern and a complete lack of sympathy, as they continue to explore the house and all of its creepy nuances.  Not surprisingly, Mac’s disappearance is only the tip of the iceberg, and soon the house begins to pick off the survivors one by one.

The truth is, no amount of words can accurately convey just what makes Hausu so special; its charms mainly lie in the exhausting number of visual tricks and effects that Obayashi implements to bring his story to life: layers of video are layered on top of each other, disembodied heads come to life and attack, pianos devour unsuspecting women…and these instances are but a small fraction lying in wait to ambush oblivious folks who pop a copy of Hausu into their preferred media player of choice.  Often, the effects themselves are pretty awful, just as they probably were even back in 1977, when this film was made.  But they’re carried out with such a childish enthusiasm and infectious energy that they somehow work, before we move right on to the next set-piece.

According to the booklet that accompanies the Criterion DVD, Obayashi took many of the ideas for the plot from his eleven-year-old daughter, which suddenly puts some things into a little more perspective:  Was he attempting to make this movie the way he imagines she would have?  Or was he taking the idea of a haunted house horror film, and intentionally twisting it into a children’s film that his daughter could enjoy?  Where did the collaboration between him and his daughter stop?  The frantic visuals and neverending imagination don’t seem so weird and out-of-place when armed with this knowledge.

Whatever your opinion of Hausu, one thing is for certain: There’s enough imagination on display here to cover the amount of originality in a year’s worth of mainstream horror releases.  It won’t wow you with its plot (though the stilted dialogue is often hilarious), but its infectious sense of fun will win over all but the most jaded of audiences.  There’s some nudity, which kind of feels a little forced, and out-of-place (these girls are all supposed to be 16), but aside from bleeding walls, not much violence or gore to speak of, making it acceptable for most older audiences. 

RECAP: It doesn’t make much sense, but that doesn’t prevent Hausu from being, quite possibly, one of my favorite horror-themed films of all time.  Based off plotlines suggested by the director’s eleven-year-old daughter, it’s a seamless blend of wild inventiveness and childish enthusiasm, blended with an absolute fearlessness to try new things that is never short of awe-inspiring.  It’s certainly not for everyone (it’s probably not for most people), but if you enjoy original works, this is a movie you simply have to see to believe.


RATING: 9/10

TRAILER

Friday, January 1, 2016

The Sentinel (1977)

Director: Michael Winner
Writer(s): Winner, from a novel by Jeffery Konvitz
Starring: Chris Sarandon, Christina Raines, Martin Balsam, and John Carradine




I purchased The Sentinel several years ago, and have never watched it; it’s one of only two movies that I can recall purchasing that I haven’t watched (the other being Nicolas Roeg’s Two Deaths).  I have no idea what made me decide I should own it, after having never watched it before, but I stumbled on it at a used store, and decided to buy it.

Over the years, I’ve come close to watching it twice, but for some reason, I got the intense premonition that this movie was boring each time, no matter what the blurb on the back of the DVD said (something about there being enough effects to stay interesting, which is certainly less than modest praise).  Then, when my wife and I had plans to watch it the other night, something came up, and she had to leave; I should have taken it as a sign.  Instead, I was an idiot and rescheduled the viewing.

The Sentinel is painfully, awfully boring; a Rosemary’s Baby knockoff but with tepid acting, and below-average writing.  In it, a model moves to a Brooklyn apartment building, complete with really strange neighbors.  But when she tells her realtor about how they’re preventing her from sleeping, we learn that no one else, save for a creepy priest, lives there in the building with her!  Oh no!  Things start to go downhill for the poor lady; only her boyfriend (terribly played by Chris Sarandon) believes her, and sets out to find the truth about the building, and its former inhabitants.  What he finds, will shock no one who’s ever watched more than three horror movies in their lifetime.

The movie’s more well-known for the bevy of familiar faces than it is the plot, and with good reason: You can find Jeff Goldblum, Beverly D’Angelo, and Christopher Walken, just to name a few.  This is also the first time in a long time I can remember giving props to the costume designer for their fashion choices:  All of the dresses Cristina Raines wears are beautiful, and are more attention-grabbing than anything else that happens in the movie (save for a couple gore sequences; neither of which are all that memorable). 

The Sentinel also gets some marks for at least being entertaining; between the poor acting, stodgy writing, and hilariously awkward poses and posturing from the actors at certain parts, it’s rife with unintentional humor.  That’s more than I can give some movies, so they’re just going to have to take it or leave it.

RECAP: A tepid, uninspired film (ironic, considering it was heavily inspired by Rosemary’s Baby) that is slightly fascinating out of the gates, and then very quickly loses steam.  The writing and acting range from bad, to terrible (Chris Sarandon, I’m looking at you), and the story is pretty much standard by-the-numbers stuff.  The only legitimate highlight: Cristina Raines wears some beautiful dresses; at least costume designer Peggy Farrell was on her game.  Other than that, there are moments of unintentional humor, as well as a couple of average gore effects, that at least will give you something to do besides be completely bored out of your skull, but not nearly enough to salvage this mess.

SCORE: 2.5/10

TRAILER