Ad Code

Showing posts with label Joe D'Amato. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe D'Amato. Show all posts

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Pieces (1982)

Director: Juan Piquer Simón
Writer(s): Dick Randall and Joe D'Amato
Starring: Christopher George, Lynda Day George, Frank Braña, and Edmund Purdom



Usually, critiquing a movie is a pretty straightforward process: you watch it, you formulate a solid opinion one way or another, and then you sit down to try to put those thoughts into review form. After all, there are really only three possibilities: it's either good, it's bad, or it's neutral. That's what I always believed, anyway, until I stumbled on the insane mess that is Pieces, which feels like it was directed by three different people, all with varying levels of competence ranging from “mild”, to “none.”

There have, and always will be, movies that are “so bad they're good”, but Pieces exists on an entirely different plane from most of the others. This is because it alternates rapidly and wildly between disparate emotions with freewheeling, reckless abandon. Take the intro, for instance. A young boy is putting together a puzzle of a nude woman when his mother, who is clearly the controlling type, busts in and catches him. She is livid, and takes things a little too far by swearing she will kill him if she ever sees him doing something like this again. She orders him to grab a plastic bag, which she is planning on using to burn the puzzle, but he has other ideas and instead returns with an axe, which he uses to kill her. But it's obvious this isn't just an innocent, ordinary kid...he is clearly a sociopath in the making; next thing you know, he's using a saw to hack her body into little pieces.

The next shot is the child calmly putting the puzzle back together again, which is now soaked in blood. So, too, is the rest of the room. He hears sirens, sees the police entering the building, and then hides in the closet, pretending to act scared when the cops find him there. We can surmise from the ensuing discussion that he is regarded only as a witness to a horrifying slaying, and that he is never considered a suspect. The opening is a little cheesy, but it's still pretty powerful stuff that shows what director Juan Piquer Simon is capable of, although the rest of his filmography seems to disagree.

Now we flash-forward forty years later, to an unidentified college campus, where young female students are being picked off one-by-one by a masked man wielding a chainsaw. Lt. Bracken (Christopher George) and Sgt. Holden (Frank Brana) are quick to arrive on campus to start their investigation, but their department seems to be rather underfunded, and unable to spare anyone else to help them out. Showing off its giallo inspirations, the two officers randomly enlist the help of a student at the school, Kendall, who is cleared as a suspect early on and all-too-eager to lend a hand.

It also shows off its crazy side, by having a famous tennis star, who happens to be a cop to earn money when she is not playing in tournaments, go undercover at the school to try to bait the killer. Just try to ignore the fact that she's about twenty years past the killer's target age, making her a lousy decoy; thankfully, only about five people seem to go to this school, so the plan actually makes better sense than it normally would. Oh yeah, and despite her being a professional tennis player, the actress that played her clearly had no idea how to actually play, yet that didn't stop the filmmakers from including scenes from a match against one of her students (according to the director, they had to hire a tennis coach to teach them how to at least lob the ball to give the appearance that they know what they're doing; between their sloppiness and the lousy editing, it's still all too evident). What is the meaning of any of this?

But that's part of its charm, because unlike a lot of “so bad they're good” movies, Pieces never takes itself too seriously, which leads to some earnestly funny scenes. The problem is, there are so many plot holes and poorly-written moments that it occasionally feels like we're laughing at things we shouldn't be laughing at. And that's a good chunk of what makes this mess work as well as it does: I can't recall another film that somehow manages to blur the line between “good” or “bad” so effectively. In many “bad” movies, the filmmakers involved are usually earnest in their intentions, and just have the misfortune of not having the talent (or the time, or the budget, etc.) to live up to their ambition. With Pieces, it's nearly impossible to tell what scenes were actually played for laughs, and which ones get them accidentally, but none of it seems to matter because you get the feeling that the filmmakers didn't seem to care. Again, whether they didn't care about the film, or merely what the audience thought about it is yet another point that gets blurred. Case-in-point: It contains a sequence that has immediately shot near the top of my list of “Most Pointless Scenes in Cinema History”; but unlike the “pancake” scene in Cabin Fever (which occupies the #1 slot), which is an idiotically “comical” scene in a film that was otherwise serious, this one actually manages to be hilarious, in an odd, off-the-wall kind of way. I won't reveal what it is, but even in a film this bizarre, you probably won't have a problem picking it out.

Technically, Pieces is adept at what it does, though it is never astonishing. The soundtrack (who is credited only to “Cam”, though it is the work of no less than three separate artists) is mostly repetitive and average, at least during the kill scenes, which don't add much in the tension department. The gore mostly comes in the form of aftermath shots, that are admittedly pretty grisly and disturbing given the film's obscure, but probably minimal, budget. However, those expecting some “live” blood, or graphic kill scenes will be largely disappointed. It's photographed competently enough, though not as interestingly as one would expect having been clearly inspired by earlier Italian slashers (known as giallo films).

I have to confess that I liked Pieces, but I am also aware that many people will not. I have always had a soft spot for films that don't cater to audience expectations, and this is certainly one that marches to the beat of its own drum, no matter how idiotic or ill-advised it may be. But in this world of watered-down, mass-produced bullshit being paraded around as “entertainment”, it is sadly refreshing to find a film that only plays to its own interests, rather than the wants of its audience.

RATING: 6/10

TRAILER



Friday, March 11, 2016

Anthropophagus: The Grim Reaper (1980)

Director: Joe D'Amato
Writer(s): D'Amato and George Eastman
Starring: Tisa Farrow, Saverio Vallone, Serena Grandi, and George Eastman


Skip this paragraph if you’ve heard me talk about my boring, movie-themed childhood, or want to avoid ruining this film's "pivotal" scene: When I was a late-teen/early-twentysomething, I went through a long phase where I tried seeking out the most graphic movies I could find. Anthropophagus was consistently mentioned as one of the “pinnacles” of such movies, and yet, for whatever reason, I never saw it.  It has gained infamy based on one harsh sequence, so known as the “fetus-eating scene”, because, in it, a pregnant character’s fetus is eaten, making it an appropriate nickname.

As I have mentioned in a previous review, slasher movies are the mainstream movie equivalent of hardcore pornography: no one cares about the story, they just want to get to the graphic bits.  Well if that analogy is considered accurate, than Anthropophagus: The Grim Reaper is the equivalent of a sex addict having to settle for softcore porn; there are long buildups to nothing, and despite its notoriety, there is surprisingly little violence, at least until its finale.  But by then, we have waited 70 minutes for something to happen, and it’s too little, too late.

It’s the kind of movie that makes much better background noise than it does actual viewing material—there’s really no mystery to speak of, save for what happened to an island’s previous inhabitants—but the answer to this is pretty clear from the outset.  To pay Anthropophagus any close attention is to simply waste your time; and by doing so, we have already put more effort into the whole production than the filmmakers themselves.

Tisa Farrow (of Lucio Fulci’s Zombie fame) plays Julie, a woman who solicits the help of some tourists looking to take a tour of Greek islands.  She, too, is looking for an island, but (surprise!) even though it’s along the way, it’s not one of them featured on the tour.  She talks them into dropping her off, where she can be reunited with some friends who inhabit the almost-uninhabited island.  With some reluctance (one of the tourists reads tarot cards, and gets a bad vibe about the place), they all agree to go.

There, they are hunted, one-by-one, and usually in long, drawn out sequences that end up with the characters being completely fine.  It’s seriously around the 50-minute mark that we even get our first glimpse of the “grim reaper” of the title, and even then he doesn’t become a main focus until we’re more than an hour in. I suppose I should be grateful that director Joe D’Amato at least tries to build some suspense, instead of just focusing on the graphic deaths, but it simply feels like padding, rather than anything of substance.

About the highest accolade that I can give it is that the killer’s makeup is pretty decent.  I have seen the actor (George Eastman, aka Louis Montefiori, who also co-wrote the film’s screenplay) in another production (Mario Bava’s excellent Rabid Dogs), and in complete makeup, even in close-ups, he is completely unrecognizable.  The gore scenes, for the most part, are pretty standard, save for the aforementioned infamous scene; though I didn’t find it to be as stomach-churning as I was expecting, I still have to give D’Amato props for at least trying something new.

Unless you are either a die-hard Italian horror fan, or a slasher film completist, there’s really not much here that’s worth the time investment required to watch it.  About the only thing that might make it worthwhile, is the fetus-eating scene, but that’s available in several locations on YouTube—if that’s the main reason you want to see this, as it was mine, then just spend the two minutes watching it online, and skip the rest.  Trust me, you’ll thank me later.

RECAP: A slow-moving “slasher” movie about a group of tourists being hunted on an uninhabited island, Anthropophagus has received attention for a nasty sequence that got the movie banned in several countries.  As grotesque as it is, it’s shockingly the only bit of creativity in this droll mess, which features no suspense, a bloated run-time of 90 minutes, and drawn-out scenes that are meant to build terror, but only end up leading to yawns.  If you’re merely curious about the infamous murder sequence described above, then save yourself 88 minutes and watch the clips of it online.


RATING: 2/10

FETUS SCENE (WARNING: NOT FOR SQUEAMISH OR MINORS)

TRAILER